Professional Standards Advisory PS-6 (April 2005)
| DATE: | April 26, 2005 |
| TO: | Members of the Public Relations Society of America (PRSA) |
| FROM: | PRSA Board of Directors PRSA Board of Ethics and Professional Standards(BEPS) |
| RE: | Professional Standards Advisory PS-6 (April 2005) |
| ISSUE: | DISCLOSURE BY EXPERT COMMENTATORS AND PROFESSIONAL SPOKESPERSONS OF PAYMENTS OR FINANCIAL INTERESTS |
All PRSA members pledge adherence to the Society's Member Code of Ethics. As issues arise relating to the practice of public relations, BEPS is charged with providing guidance on such issues within the framework of the Code provisions. To provide that guidance, we continue this series of professional standards advisories. The PRSA Member Code of Ethics may be found online at www.prsa.org.
ISSUE: The failure of commentators and professional spokespersons to disclose that they have been paid to promote a cause or point of view, or that they have a financial interest in the products or organizations on which they purport to provide expert opinion, commentary or information.
BACKGROUND: In recent months, attention has been focused on commentators, some even posing as news reporters and expert analysts whose views were presumed to be independent, but who had been paid to endorse a cause or product and had not disclosed that relationship. In one controversy, syndicated columnists supported initiatives of the Administration but was later shown to have been paid fees by the government channeled through a public relations firm. Similarly, supposedly independent consumer product experts appeared on news programs and endorsed specific products, but were later found to have been paid for those endorsements or to have had prior financial relationships with the manufacturers.
RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE PRSA CODE:
PART I: Code provisions related to this issue:
Free Flow of Information: Protecting and advancing the free flow of accurate and truthful information is essential to serving the public interest and contributing to informed decision making in a democratic society.
A member shall:
Disclosure of Information. Open communication fosters informed decision-making in a democratic society.
A member shall:
Conflicts of Interest. Avoiding real, potential or perceived conflicts of interest builds the trust of clients, employers and the publics.
A member shall:
Enhancing the Profession. Public relations professionals work constantly to strengthen the public's trust in the profession.
A member shall:
PART II: Professional values related to this issue:
OPINION UNDERLYING RECOMMENDED STANDARDS
One of the foundations of a system of free expression is the presumed fairness and independence of reportage, analysis and commentary in the news media. In this system, a diversity of viewpoints and opinions needs to be heard, but must compete on the merits of argument and fact. When a point of view, organization or product is given an unfair advantage as a result of financial payments, it undermines the integrity of the system itself.
Spokespeople, commentators, product experts or others who offer opinions or points of view within the news media have a responsibility to disclose any financial relationships they may have with a person, organization, product or other entity on which they offer comment or perspective. This responsibility extends to public relations professionals who may enlist such spokespersons on behalf of a client. Moreover, the responsibility is an affirmative one: it cannot be left to reporters or others involved in the process.
Recommended Best Practice
Principal BEPS Author: Patrick Hirigoyen