Professional Standards Advisory PS-9 (October 2008)
Co Authors: Emmanuel Tchividjian, Jim Lukaszewski, Tom Eppes
Peer Review: PRSA BEPS Members including Dean Kruckeberg, Pat Whalen, Tom Duke, Keith Mabee, Patty Grey, and Patrick McLaughlin
TO: Members of the Public Relations Society of America
FROM: PRSA Board of Directors - PRSA Board of Ethics and Professional Standards
RE: Pay for Play Practices of making undisclosed payment to journalists or media to publish or broadcast a client’s story.
All PRSA members pledge adherence to the Society's Member Code of Ethics. As issues arise relating to the practice of public relations, the Board of Ethics and Professional Standards (BEPS) is charged with providing guidance on such issues within the framework of the Code provisions. The PRSA Board of Directors then provides these guidelines through professional standards advisories. The PRSA Member Code of Ethics may be found online at www.prsa.org.
ISSUE: Pay for Play (PFP) occurs when there is intent to hide an exchange of value between a PR professional and a journalist. It occurs when PR professionals make undisclosed payments to journalists or media to publish or broadcast a client’s story. Or, when PR professionals compensate journalists or media to allow placement of stories that appear to be editorial material, again, failing to disclose that the information was provided by outside sources and for which compensation (including advertising) was provided in some form in exchange for publication or broadcast. The payment can be in various forms, including gifts and future favors.
A variety of Pay for Play practices occur in many industries and countries. Business behaviors and customs vary widely. The purpose of this discussion is to provide guidance for PR practitioners on how to address these practices while remaining faithful to the PRSA Code.
As publics demand greater transparency from institutions, internationally and inter-culturally, it is important that public relations practitioners do their part in addressing any undisclosed practice that could significantly affect the credibility of communications channels. Media professionals are responsible for their own ethical issues. The ethical practitioner encourages disclosure of any exchange of value that influences how those they represent are covered. .
BACKGROUND: “Pay for Play” (PFP), the undisclosed compensation of reporters or media for the placement of editorial material, is improper under the PRSA code of ethics. Readers, listeners, and viewers have the right to expect advance disclosure about anything that might compromise the integrity of the information they are getting. There are gray areas, in that definitions of ethical impropriety may vary widely between industries, countries and individuals and PFP is condoned and expected in many cultures.
RELEVANT SECTIONS OF THE PRSA CODE: At least four Code provisions and three professional values relate to this issue. They are:
Code provisions
Professional Values
Unethical Behavior Under the Current Code
A public relations professional KNOWINGLY FAILS TO REQUEST DISCLOSURE of confidential compensation to a communication medium for placement of specific editorial content, which could come from editorial staff of the communication medium, the PR professional or an advertising agency.
RECOMMENDED PRACTICES